Skip to main content

Men of Ideas - Noam Chomsky with Bryan Magee (1978)

Men of Ideas (1978) and The Great Philosophers (1987) are two BBC programs put forward and conducted by the philosopher and author, Bryan Magee. Both programs are based on the interview of an intellectual figure addressing a particular issue, either being current works of themselves that have had a great impact in the interviewee's field of competence (Men of Ideas) or History of Philosophy (The Great Philosophers). Needless to say, Bryan Magee within these programs is not just an interviewer, he is often driving the attention to very elusive or darkly explained subjects. Magee partners with the interviewee to engage in very deep philosophical debates while being an accomplice of the audience without any sign of condescendence.

I want to share with you a great example of this kind of talks: an interview with Prof. Noam Chomsky on his works that has revolutionized the field of linguistics and that have had a strong impact in psychology. Chomsky is one the fathers of the cognitive sciences which transcend language inquiries.

Enjoy!



Other episodes of Men of Ideas (1978) that I can recommend are:

Anthony Quinton on "The Two Philosophies of Wittgenstein"

Bernard Williams on "The spell of Linguistic Philosophy"

John Searle on "The Philosophy of Language"

Hilary Putnam on "The Philosophy of Science"

Iris Murdoch on "Philosophy and Literature"

Almost ten years after, The Great Philosophers (1987) is as good as Men of Ideas. You will see recurrent figures in the interviews, such as Anthony Quinton, Bernard Williams and John Searle. Here you have a list of episodes I can suggest:

Myles Burnyeat on Plato

Martha Nussbaum on Aristotle

Anthony Kenny on Medieval Philosophy 

Bernard Williams on Descartes

Anthony Quinton on Spinoza and Leibniz

John Searle on Wittgenstein

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slow science/publishing and educational system

Guys, I don't know if you already know about the ''Slow science movement'' or not, well this is a wiki definition for it: Slow science  is part of the broader  slow movement . It is based on the belief that  science  should be a slow, steady, methodical process, and that scientists should not be expected to provide "quick fixes" to society's problems. Slow science supports  curiosity -driven  scientific research  and opposes  performance targets . I'm personally interested in it if you remember Gabriel once we had a discussion on the waste of energy and resources to produce junk science and the fact that scientists are losing balance on looking into science.  Sometimes people do not know why they publish and for the sake of what?! it's become a tradition or kinda religion.  I'm most agreed with the directed scientific activities, slowly going ahead and touching the problem, whenever you can swallow the problem with...

La pioggia nel pineto (Gabriele D'Annunzio) - declaimed by Roberto Herlitzka

Since Federico is not contributing yet, I will post one of his suggestions on Italian poetry. This is a declamation (more than a reading) by Roberto Herlitzka, and it is part of the Vittorio Gassman's personal anthology of recited poetry from Italian authors. Feel the bucolic environment and the euphemistically romantic tensions. And then, the crescendo...

Firing Line - Thomas Sowell with William F. Buckley, Jr. (1981)

Firing Line is a TV show from the US I discovered just a few days ago. It is always conducted by William F. Buckley, Jr. of whom it has been said to be  "arguably the most important public intellectual in the United States in the past half-century…".   The program is a talk show based upon the interview of top level intellectual figures from the US and abroad on different topics. It has the nice quality of being intellectually challenging while often dealing with highly polemic issues. See Hoover institution archives on Firing Line broadcasts for more features and details. In particular, the interview with Prof. Thomas Sowell in 1981 (entitled "The economic lot of minorities") contains a profound debate supported with lots of data on race and gender discrimination, and how unemployment and low income rates relate to education in ethnic minorities and women. I hope you reflect on these difficult points, which are still unresolved 36 years after this interview. ...