Skip to main content

Closer to Truth - Alison Gopnik with Robert L. Kuhn (2017)

Image
By
Ever since I found the Bryan Magee TV series on Modern Philosophy and the History of Philosophy broadcasted at prime time by BBC in the late 70s and 80s, I have been searching for similar shows still on air today or at least more recent. It is a difficult quest, but it is fortunately coronated by findings as interesting as Closer to Truth. The host Robert Lawrence Kuhn is a quite different kind host, and the show is very much influenced by the speed and headlines need of the present day media. So, this time you won't find any sofa-lying attitude and a kind of conversational reasoning to help the exposition of very fundamental ideas, a signature of Bryan Magee's programs. Instead, the new host urges the interviewee to go straight to the subject and extracts well-stated concise summaries without giving too much time to the audience to polish their rough interpretations of their actual ideas. Indeed is more an interview-base program and less of debate. But the host is still key at unraveling the complexities of the interviewee's ideas. (You will notice that a common feature of all these interviews is the out-of-focus camera at the beginning rapidly changing to a clear image: a very symbolic way of telling the audience about their style of extracting knowledge).

Here I share with you one example of these interviews about the philosophy of science from the perspective of developmental psychology. That's right, studying philosophy of science from babies... I hope you enjoy it!

Comments

  1. CláudiaMarch 5, 2018 at 7:20 AM

    Maybe this capacity seen in children is what it's called the patterning instinct in the book I mentioned before. The tendency to search for patterns and meaning in everything.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RSA Animate - Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us - Daniel Pink

By
RSA Animate is a collection of 10 min cartoon-like animations on a whiteboard that partners with a synthesis of a conference given by renown academics in RSA Events . This series is put forward by the Royal Society of Arts (RSA), who aim at a 21st century enlightenment .  I first saw some of the short-film series while being in Cuba. I remember I was astonished by the amount of information they could compress in a 10 min talk. Then, I noticed that there was a great deal of post-processing after the 'natural' 30 min or so talk. Nonetheless, it is still amazing how they can manage to do it so smoothly. The animations deserve special attention. They are not only accompanying the talk but they actually supply complementary information, in terms of irony, cultural references, etc., while marking a step-by-step evolution of the speech in a better way than any slide show could do. Here is an RSA Animate example on "Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us", ...
1 comment
Read more

VSauce - How to count past infinity - Michael Stevens

By
VSauce is a youtube channel created by Michael Stevens, graduated from psychology and English literature and turned educator and Internet personality. In my opinion, nothing in Stevens's academic career, other than his insatiable curiosity and his tremendous discipline, could have ever been used to forecast the success of his enterprise of weekly scripting, directing and hosting high level youtube videos concerning a variety of topics, ranging from human to exact sciences. The quality of the videos had been increasing since the beginning of VSauce back in 2010, not only in its visual appeal but also in the script, didactics, and the selection of subjects. Now VSauce is as mature as any TV show or documentary. Furthermore, the episodes (videos?) are incredibly profound and often self-contained. Here you have a recent example. It is very accurate in its mathematical definitions and the proofs for each statement, while conveying the message to any sufficiently interested audience i...
1 comment
Read more

Slow science/publishing and educational system

By
Guys, I don't know if you already know about the ''Slow science movement'' or not, well this is a wiki definition for it: Slow science  is part of the broader  slow movement . It is based on the belief that  science  should be a slow, steady, methodical process, and that scientists should not be expected to provide "quick fixes" to society's problems. Slow science supports  curiosity -driven  scientific research  and opposes  performance targets . I'm personally interested in it if you remember Gabriel once we had a discussion on the waste of energy and resources to produce junk science and the fact that scientists are losing balance on looking into science.  Sometimes people do not know why they publish and for the sake of what?! it's become a tradition or kinda religion.  I'm most agreed with the directed scientific activities, slowly going ahead and touching the problem, whenever you can swallow the problem with...
8 comments
Read more