Skip to main content

Closer to Truth - Big Questions in Free Will (2016)

Image
By
My first contact with Closer to Truth was through an amazing documentary that it's worth to mention separately from their typical interviews. It is a very exhaustive and in-depth exposition of the main difficulties facing philosophers, scientists and theologists dealing with the idea of free will. Big Questions in Free Will (2016) shows and elaborates on hardcore conundrums such as: Do we really have free will or is it an illusion? Are moral judgement and legal responsability strongly linked to free will? Does the possible existence of god perturb our idea of free will? And much more... It is very informative, on one side, to follow philosophers struggling to develop and explain logical arguments that should solve these issues, and on the other, to watch scientists designing and performing very cleaver experiments to test some of the key hypotheses behind those issues. Keeping up with the philosophical and the scientific research is not only interesting, it is actually a great intellectual exercise, which I recommend even if you don't care too much about free will.

If you have any strong believes about free will, now they will be weaken. If you have always thought it was a minor abstract question, you will probably reconsider. If you think you have a real grasp at the notion of free will at all, you will see how naive you've been all along.

Enjoy!


Comments

  1. CláudiaMarch 5, 2018 at 7:16 AM

    Very interesting but there is still something unsatisfactory about this discussion. I was trying to remember a comment about free will I heard in a interview, but I couldn't find it. I'll mention it if I find it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gabriel J. Gil PérezMarch 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM

      You can find more on free will in the Firing Line (http://pingpongpongpong.blogspot.it/2017/03/firing-line-thomas-sowell-with-william.html) entitled "The case against freedom", a debate between William F. Buckley Jr., B.F. Skinner and D. MacCrimmon MacKay (https://youtu.be/1DMyDYgxFlo).

      Delete
    2. CláudiaMarch 5, 2018 at 3:36 PM

      Thanks!!!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RSA Animate - Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us - Daniel Pink

By
RSA Animate is a collection of 10 min cartoon-like animations on a whiteboard that partners with a synthesis of a conference given by renown academics in RSA Events . This series is put forward by the Royal Society of Arts (RSA), who aim at a 21st century enlightenment .  I first saw some of the short-film series while being in Cuba. I remember I was astonished by the amount of information they could compress in a 10 min talk. Then, I noticed that there was a great deal of post-processing after the 'natural' 30 min or so talk. Nonetheless, it is still amazing how they can manage to do it so smoothly. The animations deserve special attention. They are not only accompanying the talk but they actually supply complementary information, in terms of irony, cultural references, etc., while marking a step-by-step evolution of the speech in a better way than any slide show could do. Here is an RSA Animate example on "Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us", ...
1 comment
Read more

La pioggia nel pineto (Gabriele D'Annunzio) - declaimed by Roberto Herlitzka

By
Since Federico is not contributing yet, I will post one of his suggestions on Italian poetry. This is a declamation (more than a reading) by Roberto Herlitzka, and it is part of the Vittorio Gassman's personal anthology of recited poetry from Italian authors. Feel the bucolic environment and the euphemistically romantic tensions. And then, the crescendo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Slow science/publishing and educational system

By
Guys, I don't know if you already know about the ''Slow science movement'' or not, well this is a wiki definition for it: Slow science  is part of the broader  slow movement . It is based on the belief that  science  should be a slow, steady, methodical process, and that scientists should not be expected to provide "quick fixes" to society's problems. Slow science supports  curiosity -driven  scientific research  and opposes  performance targets . I'm personally interested in it if you remember Gabriel once we had a discussion on the waste of energy and resources to produce junk science and the fact that scientists are losing balance on looking into science.  Sometimes people do not know why they publish and for the sake of what?! it's become a tradition or kinda religion.  I'm most agreed with the directed scientific activities, slowly going ahead and touching the problem, whenever you can swallow the problem with...
8 comments
Read more